GitHub|Since 2007

esHostaliavsNominaliaes

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1385 ms
Rank#433
TTFB999ms
Time to 1MB194ms
Score1385
LCP1399ms
FCP1199ms
WPTR Score1845 ms
Rank#565
TTFB481ms
Time to 1MB641ms
Score1845
LCP881ms
FCP681ms

Our Verdict

Nominalia wins with 481ms TTFB (vs Hostalia's 999ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHostaliaNominaliaWinner
DNS Lookup165ms45msNominalia
TCP Connection5ms99msHostalia
TLS Handshake9ms108msHostalia
Server Processing740ms55msNominalia
Total TTFB919ms307msNominalia

Technology & Security Features

Hostalia

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size70.0 KB

Nominalia

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size145.1 KB
2/3
Hostalia Security Features
1/3
Nominalia Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.