GitHub|Since 2007

pkHostBreakvsNayatelpk

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner2441 ms
Rank#640
TTFB1606ms
Time to 1MB350ms
Score2441
LCP2006ms
FCP1806ms
WPTR Score5486 ms
Rank#808
TTFB551ms
Time to 1MB1990ms
Score5486
LCP951ms
FCP751ms

Our Verdict

Nayatel wins with 551ms TTFB (vs HostBreak's 1606ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHostBreakNayatelWinner
DNS Lookup65ms177msHostBreak
TCP Connection71ms170msHostBreak
TLS Handshake50ms172msHostBreak
Server Processing1415ms191msNayatel
Total TTFB1601ms710msNayatel

Technology & Security Features

HostBreak

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size256.1 KB

Nayatel

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size136.7 KB
2/3
HostBreak Security Features
1/3
Nayatel Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.