GitHub|Since 2007

siHosterdamvsZabec.netsi

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score3733 ms
Rank#290
TTFB587ms
Time to 1MB180ms
Score3733
LCP987ms
FCP787ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1086 ms
Rank#308
TTFB350ms
Time to 1MB292ms
Score1086
LCP750ms
FCP550ms

Our Verdict

Zabec.net wins with 350ms TTFB (vs Hosterdam's 587ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHosterdamZabec.netWinner
DNS Lookup42ms94msHosterdam
TCP Connection134ms70msZabec.net
TLS Handshake47ms113msHosterdam
Server Processing3078ms108msZabec.net
Total TTFB3301ms385msZabec.net

Technology & Security Features

Hosterdam

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size1010.5 KB

Zabec.net

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size24.5 KB
2/3
Hosterdam Security Features
0/3
Zabec.net Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.