GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

plHostersivsWebh.plpl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Hostersi
WPTR Score741 ms
Rank#168
TTFB170ms
Time to 1MB219ms
Score741
LCP570ms
FCP370ms
Webh.pl
WPTR ScoreWinner513 ms
Rank#61
TTFB103ms
Time to 1MB141ms
Score513
LCP503ms
FCP303ms

Our Verdict

Webh.pl wins with 103ms TTFB (vs Hostersi's 170ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHostersiWebh.plWinner
DNS Lookup94ms51msWebh.pl
TCP Connection39ms11msWebh.pl
TLS Handshake40ms15msWebh.pl
Server Processing42ms98msHostersi
Total TTFB215ms175msWebh.pl

Technology & Security Features

Hostersi

Server/CDNAmazonS3
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size63.7 KB

Webh.pl

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size190.4 KB
1/3
Hostersi Security Features
2/3
Webh.pl Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.