GitHub|Since 2007

roHosticovsHostVisionro

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1266 ms
Rank#362
TTFB230ms
Time to 1MB401ms
Score1266
LCP630ms
FCP430ms
WPTR Score2502 ms
Rank#678
TTFB197ms
Time to 1MB1001ms
Score2502
LCP597ms
FCP397ms

Our Verdict

HostVision wins with 197ms TTFB (vs Hostico's 230ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHosticoHostVisionWinner
DNS Lookup62ms35msHostVision
TCP Connection110ms17msHostVision
TLS Handshake53ms20msHostVision
Server Processing79ms28msHostVision
Total TTFB304ms100msHostVision

Technology & Security Features

Hostico

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size339.2 KB

HostVision

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.3 KB
0/3
Hostico Security Features
2/3
HostVision Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.