GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

plHostidovsSeoHostpl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Hostido
WPTR Score1953 ms
Rank#553
TTFB203ms
Time to 1MB728ms
Score1953
LCP603ms
FCP403ms
SeoHost
WPTR ScoreWinner1256 ms
Rank#355
TTFB493ms
Time to 1MB280ms
Score1256
LCP893ms
FCP693ms

Our Verdict

Hostido wins with 203ms TTFB (vs SeoHost's 493ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHostidoSeoHostWinner
DNS Lookup4ms129msHostido
TCP Connection57ms128msHostido
TLS Handshake63ms73msHostido
Server Processing82ms254msHostido
Total TTFB206ms584msHostido

Technology & Security Features

Hostido

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size135.3 KB

SeoHost

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size373.9 KB
1/3
Hostido Security Features
3/3
SeoHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.