GitHub|Since 2007

clHosting.clvsTecnoWebcl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner2138 ms
Rank#660
TTFB1952ms
Time to 1MB239ms
Score2138
LCP2352ms
FCP2152ms
WPTR Score7430 ms
Rank#849
TTFB716ms
Time to 1MB2965ms
Score7430
LCP1116ms
FCP916ms

Our Verdict

TecnoWeb wins with 716ms TTFB (vs Hosting.cl's 1952ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHosting.clTecnoWebWinner
DNS Lookup416ms63msTecnoWeb
TCP Connection471ms5msTecnoWeb
TLS Handshake276ms8msTecnoWeb
Server Processing401ms238msTecnoWeb
Total TTFB1564ms314msTecnoWeb

Technology & Security Features

Hosting.cl

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size41.7 KB

TecnoWeb

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size569.7 KB
1/3
Hosting.cl Security Features
2/3
TecnoWeb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.