HostingPerTevsNoamweb
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

HostingPerTe
View Details →
Noamweb
View Details →Our Verdict
Noamweb wins with 867ms TTFB (vs HostingPerTe's 1361ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | HostingPerTe | Noamweb | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 4ms | 345ms | HostingPerTe |
| TCP Connection | 210ms | 64ms | Noamweb |
| TLS Handshake | 75ms | 186ms | HostingPerTe |
| Server Processing | 564ms | 71ms | Noamweb |
| Total TTFB | 853ms | 666ms | Noamweb |
Technology & Security Features
HostingPerTe
Noamweb
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.