GitHub|Since 2007

trHostixovsOdeawebtr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner450 ms
Rank#70
TTFB177ms
Time to 1MB118ms
Score450
LCP577ms
FCP377ms
WPTR Score1336 ms
Rank#588
TTFB1864ms
Time to 1MB124ms
Score1336
LCP2264ms
FCP2064ms

Our Verdict

Hostixo wins with 177ms TTFB (vs Odeaweb's 1864ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHostixoOdeawebWinner
DNS Lookup37ms5msOdeaweb
TCP Connection13ms14msHostixo
TLS Handshake20ms19msOdeaweb
Server Processing97ms1000msHostixo
Total TTFB167ms1038msHostixo

Technology & Security Features

Hostixo

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size282.6 KB

Odeaweb

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size158.2 KB
3/3
Hostixo Security Features
1/3
Odeaweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.