GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

trHostixovsVargonentr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Hostixo
WPTR ScoreWinner450 ms
Rank#70
TTFB177ms
Time to 1MB118ms
Score450
LCP577ms
FCP377ms
Vargonen
WPTR Score3772 ms
Rank#55
TTFB106ms
Time to 1MB134ms
Score3772
LCP506ms
FCP306ms

Our Verdict

Vargonen wins with 106ms TTFB (vs Hostixo's 177ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHostixoVargonenWinner
DNS Lookup37ms6msVargonen
TCP Connection13ms16msHostixo
TLS Handshake20ms21msHostixo
Server Processing97ms3407msHostixo
Total TTFB167ms3450msVargonen

Technology & Security Features

Hostixo

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size282.6 KB

Vargonen

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size139.1 KB
3/3
Hostixo Security Features
2/3
Vargonen Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.