GitHub|Since 2007

TRHostlarvsLimonHosttr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1989 ms
Rank#589
TTFB1046ms
Time to 1MB466ms
Score1989
LCP1446ms
FCP1246ms
WPTR Score2497 ms
Rank#676
TTFB1813ms
Time to 1MB314ms
Score2497
LCP2213ms
FCP2013ms

Our Verdict

Hostlar wins with 1046ms TTFB (vs LimonHost's 1813ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHostlarLimonHostWinner
DNS Lookup39ms6msLimonHost
TCP Connection76ms5msLimonHost
TLS Handshake62ms11msLimonHost
Server Processing694ms1721msHostlar
Total TTFB871ms1743msHostlar

Technology & Security Features

Hostlar

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size615.4 KB

LimonHost

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size85.8 KB
1/3
Hostlar Security Features
2/3
LimonHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.