GitHub|Since 2007

inHostLelovsHostSochin

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner761 ms
Rank#189
TTFB507ms
Time to 1MB102ms
Score761
LCP907ms
FCP707ms
WPTR Score4473 ms
Rank#775
TTFB858ms
Time to 1MB1468ms
Score4473
LCP1258ms
FCP1058ms

Our Verdict

HostLelo wins with 507ms TTFB (vs HostSoch's 858ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHostLeloHostSochWinner
DNS Lookup68ms85msHostLelo
TCP Connection39ms332msHostLelo
TLS Handshake116ms252msHostLelo
Server Processing293ms281msHostSoch
Total TTFB516ms950msHostLelo

Technology & Security Features

HostLelo

Server/CDNVercel
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size211.5 KB

HostSoch

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size9.2 KB
2/3
HostLelo Security Features
0/3
HostSoch Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.