HostNamastevsXcellHost
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

HostNamaste
View Details →
XcellHost
View Details →Our Verdict
XcellHost wins with 383ms TTFB (vs HostNamaste's 1212ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | HostNamaste | XcellHost | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 37ms | 118ms | HostNamaste |
| TCP Connection | 11ms | 38ms | HostNamaste |
| TLS Handshake | 18ms | 45ms | HostNamaste |
| Server Processing | 1482ms | 64ms | XcellHost |
| Total TTFB | 1548ms | 265ms | XcellHost |
Technology & Security Features
HostNamaste
XcellHost
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.