HostnamevsPlanetaHosting
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Hostname
View Details →
PlanetaHosting
View Details →Our Verdict
PlanetaHosting wins with 846ms TTFB (vs Hostname's 2425ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Hostname | PlanetaHosting | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 947ms | 463ms | PlanetaHosting |
| TCP Connection | 621ms | 355ms | PlanetaHosting |
| TLS Handshake | 241ms | 137ms | PlanetaHosting |
| Server Processing | 474ms | 644ms | Hostname |
| Total TTFB | 2283ms | 1599ms | PlanetaHosting |
Technology & Security Features
Hostname
PlanetaHosting
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.