GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

thHostNeverDievsReadyplanetth

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

HostNeverDie

HostNeverDie

View Details →
WPTR ScoreWinner739 ms
Rank#402
TTFB961ms
Time to 1MB155ms
Score739
LCP1361ms
FCP1161ms
Readyplanet

Readyplanet

View Details →
WPTR Score4153 ms
Rank#753
TTFB1154ms
Time to 1MB1061ms
Score4153
LCP1554ms
FCP1354ms

Our Verdict

HostNeverDie wins with 961ms TTFB (vs Readyplanet's 1154ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHostNeverDieReadyplanetWinner
DNS Lookup17ms112msHostNeverDie
TCP Connection39ms99msHostNeverDie
TLS Handshake17ms7msReadyplanet
Server Processing294ms1389msHostNeverDie
Total TTFB367ms1607msHostNeverDie

Technology & Security Features

HostNeverDie

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size90.7 KB

Readyplanet

Server/CDNNext.js
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size692.0 KB
2/3
HostNeverDie Security Features
2/3
Readyplanet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.