HostParkvsVargonen
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

HostPark
View Details →
Vargonen
View Details →Our Verdict
Vargonen wins with 106ms TTFB (vs HostPark's 363ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | HostPark | Vargonen | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 38ms | 6ms | Vargonen |
| TCP Connection | 27ms | 16ms | Vargonen |
| TLS Handshake | 27ms | 21ms | Vargonen |
| Server Processing | 218ms | 3407ms | HostPark |
| Total TTFB | 310ms | 3450ms | Vargonen |
Technology & Security Features
HostPark
Vargonen
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.