HostpointvsSwizzonic
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Hostpoint
View Details →
Swizzonic
View Details →Our Verdict
Hostpoint wins with 237ms TTFB (vs Swizzonic's 507ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Hostpoint | Swizzonic | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 28ms | 7ms | Swizzonic |
| TCP Connection | 39ms | 65ms | Hostpoint |
| TLS Handshake | 41ms | 101ms | Hostpoint |
| Server Processing | 42ms | 249ms | Hostpoint |
| Total TTFB | 150ms | 422ms | Hostpoint |
Technology & Security Features
Hostpoint
Swizzonic
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.