HoststarvsSwizzonic
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Hoststar
View Details →
Swizzonic
View Details →Our Verdict
Swizzonic wins with 507ms TTFB (vs Hoststar's 1882ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Hoststar | Swizzonic | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 45ms | 7ms | Swizzonic |
| TCP Connection | 149ms | 65ms | Swizzonic |
| TLS Handshake | 57ms | 101ms | Hoststar |
| Server Processing | 869ms | 249ms | Swizzonic |
| Total TTFB | 1120ms | 422ms | Swizzonic |
Technology & Security Features
Hoststar
Swizzonic
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.