GitHub|Since 2007

chhosttechvsMetanetch

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner775 ms
Rank#242
TTFB417ms
Time to 1MB210ms
Score775
LCP817ms
FCP617ms
WPTR Score1460 ms
Rank#556
TTFB935ms
Time to 1MB479ms
Score1460
LCP1335ms
FCP1135ms

Our Verdict

hosttech wins with 417ms TTFB (vs Metanet's 935ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhasehosttechMetanetWinner
DNS Lookup44ms50mshosttech
TCP Connection99ms52msMetanet
TLS Handshake60ms77mshosttech
Server Processing68ms131mshosttech
Total TTFB271ms310mshosttech

Technology & Security Features

hosttech

Server/CDNApache/2.4.65 (Debia
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size1289.0 KB

Metanet

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size200.9 KB
0/3
hosttech Security Features
1/3
Metanet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.