Hotel da WEBvsZ.com (GMO Thailand)

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 1/11/2026

Hotel da WEB

View Details →

WPTR ScoreWinner11451 ms

Rank#871

TTFB2782ms

Time to 1MB3612ms

Score11451

LCP3182ms

FCP2982ms

Z.com (GMO Thailand)

View Details →

WPTR Score16560 ms

Rank#892

TTFB3233ms

Time to 1MB5553ms

Score16560

LCP3633ms

FCP3433ms

Our Verdict

Hotel da WEB wins with 2782ms TTFB (vs Z.com (GMO Thailand)'s 3233ms)

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: WPTR Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).

TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds

Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)

LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads

FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears

Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.