GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

czHukotvsVSHostingcz

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Hukot
WPTR ScoreWinner1159 ms
Rank#373
TTFB569ms
Time to 1MB274ms
Score1159
LCP969ms
FCP769ms
VSHosting
WPTR Score1791 ms
Rank#428
TTFB248ms
Time to 1MB494ms
Score1791
LCP648ms
FCP448ms

Our Verdict

VSHosting wins with 248ms TTFB (vs Hukot's 569ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHukotVSHostingWinner
DNS Lookup48ms41msVSHosting
TCP Connection335ms36msVSHosting
TLS Handshake54ms37msVSHosting
Server Processing64ms491msHukot
Total TTFB501ms605msVSHosting

Technology & Security Features

Hukot

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size35.2 KB

VSHosting

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size214.8 KB
0/3
Hukot Security Features
1/3
VSHosting Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.