HyperHostvsMirohost
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

HyperHost
View Details →
Mirohost
View Details →Our Verdict
HyperHost wins with 245ms TTFB (vs Mirohost's 492ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | HyperHost | Mirohost | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 1ms | 58ms | HyperHost |
| TCP Connection | 15ms | 56ms | HyperHost |
| TLS Handshake | 19ms | 56ms | HyperHost |
| Server Processing | 141ms | 138ms | Mirohost |
| Total TTFB | 176ms | 308ms | HyperHost |
Technology & Security Features
HyperHost
Mirohost
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.