GitHub|Since 2007

GBHyve Managed HostingvsTsoHostGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Hyve Managed Hosting

Hyve Managed Hosting

View Details
WPTR Score2475 ms
Rank#665
TTFB117ms
Time to 1MB993ms
Score2475
LCP517ms
FCP317ms
WPTR ScoreWinner746 ms
Rank#314
TTFB664ms
Time to 1MB173ms
Score746
LCP1064ms
FCP864ms

Our Verdict

Hyve Managed Hosting wins with 117ms TTFB (vs TsoHost's 664ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHyve Managed HostingTsoHostWinner
DNS Lookup26ms1msTsoHost
TCP Connection16ms29msHyve Managed Hosting
TLS Handshake21ms32msHyve Managed Hosting
Server Processing29ms269msHyve Managed Hosting
Total TTFB92ms331msHyve Managed Hosting

Technology & Security Features

Hyve Managed Hosting

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.4 KB

TsoHost

Server/CDNenvoy
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size897.1 KB
2/3
Hyve Managed Hosting Security Features
0/3
TsoHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.