GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

plIBE.plvsProgresopl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

IBE.pl
WPTR Score1295 ms
Rank#442
TTFB756ms
Time to 1MB303ms
Score1295
LCP1156ms
FCP956ms
Progreso
WPTR ScoreWinner705 ms
Rank#144
TTFB387ms
Time to 1MB105ms
Score705
LCP787ms
FCP587ms

Our Verdict

Progreso wins with 387ms TTFB (vs IBE.pl's 756ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseIBE.plProgresoWinner
DNS Lookup159ms66msProgreso
TCP Connection154ms125msProgreso
TLS Handshake88ms123msIBE.pl
Server Processing167ms139msProgreso
Total TTFB568ms453msProgreso

Technology & Security Features

IBE.pl

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size110.1 KB

Progreso

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size164.0 KB
1/3
IBE.pl Security Features
0/3
Progreso Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.