GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

vniNETvsNhân Hòavn

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

iNET
WPTR ScoreWinner2085 ms
Rank#575
TTFB1571ms
Time to 1MB229ms
Score2085
LCP1971ms
FCP1771ms
Nhân Hòa
WPTR Score3436 ms
Rank#695
TTFB872ms
Time to 1MB755ms
Score3436
LCP1272ms
FCP1072ms

Our Verdict

Nhân Hòa wins with 872ms TTFB (vs iNET's 1571ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseiNETNhân HòaWinner
DNS Lookup5ms36msiNET
TCP Connection300ms15msNhân Hòa
TLS Handshake596ms21msNhân Hòa
Server Processing634ms1552msiNET
Total TTFB1535ms1624msNhân Hòa

Technology & Security Features

iNET

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size67.5 KB

Nhân Hòa

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size348.0 KB
0/3
iNET Security Features
1/3
Nhân Hòa Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.