GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

atInternexvsIPAXat

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Internex
WPTR Score2362 ms
Rank#617
TTFB105ms
Time to 1MB935ms
Score2362
LCP505ms
FCP305ms
IPAX
WPTR ScoreWinner537 ms
Rank#60
TTFB160ms
Time to 1MB117ms
Score537
LCP560ms
FCP360ms

Our Verdict

Internex wins with 105ms TTFB (vs IPAX's 160ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseInternexIPAXWinner
DNS Lookup55ms85msInternex
TCP Connection21ms42msInternex
TLS Handshake24ms51msInternex
Server Processing18ms78msInternex
Total TTFB118ms256msInternex

Technology & Security Features

Internex

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size4.4 KB

IPAX

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size153.7 KB
1/3
Internex Security Features
1/3
IPAX Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.