GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

atIPAXvsWorld4Youat

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

IPAX
WPTR ScoreWinner537 ms
Rank#60
TTFB160ms
Time to 1MB117ms
Score537
LCP560ms
FCP360ms
World4You
WPTR Score1015 ms
Rank#339
TTFB588ms
Time to 1MB224ms
Score1015
LCP988ms
FCP788ms

Our Verdict

IPAX wins with 160ms TTFB (vs World4You's 588ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseIPAXWorld4YouWinner
DNS Lookup85ms55msWorld4You
TCP Connection42ms52msIPAX
TLS Handshake51ms50msWorld4You
Server Processing78ms320msIPAX
Total TTFB256ms477msIPAX

Technology & Security Features

IPAX

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size153.7 KB

World4You

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size59.8 KB
1/3
IPAX Security Features
2/3
World4You Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.