GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

itIrideosvsXlogicit

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Irideos
WPTR Score3374 ms
Rank#754
TTFB2480ms
Time to 1MB509ms
Score3374
LCP2880ms
FCP2680ms
Xlogic
WPTR ScoreWinner1493 ms
Rank#437
TTFB214ms
Time to 1MB523ms
Score1493
LCP614ms
FCP414ms

Our Verdict

Xlogic wins with 214ms TTFB (vs Irideos's 2480ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseIrideosXlogicWinner
DNS Lookup56ms47msXlogic
TCP Connection93ms64msXlogic
TLS Handshake100ms67msXlogic
Server Processing1903ms60msXlogic
Total TTFB2152ms238msXlogic

Technology & Security Features

Irideos

Server/CDNMicrosoft-IIS/10.0
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size374.6 KB

Xlogic

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size169.2 KB
1/3
Irideos Security Features
3/3
Xlogic Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.