GitHub|Since 2007

trİsimtescilvsKriwebtr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

İsimtescil

İsimtescil

View Details
WPTR Score1033 ms
Rank#267
TTFB546ms
Time to 1MB164ms
Score1033
LCP946ms
FCP746ms
WPTR ScoreWinner486 ms
Rank#41
TTFB62ms
Time to 1MB140ms
Score486
LCP462ms
FCP262ms

Our Verdict

Kriweb wins with 62ms TTFB (vs İsimtescil's 546ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseİsimtescilKriwebWinner
DNS Lookup107ms44msKriweb
TCP Connection108ms56msKriweb
TLS Handshake40ms9msKriweb
Server Processing384ms41msKriweb
Total TTFB639ms150msKriweb

Technology & Security Features

İsimtescil

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size383.5 KB

Kriweb

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size109.0 KB
1/3
İsimtescil Security Features
0/3
Kriweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.