GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

kriWinVvsPHPS.krkr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

iWinV
WPTR Score13870 ms
Rank#882
TTFB3119ms
Time to 1MB4928ms
Score13870
LCP3519ms
FCP3319ms
PHPS.kr
WPTR ScoreWinner5436 ms
Rank#821
TTFB3265ms
Time to 1MB1259ms
Score5436
LCP3665ms
FCP3465ms

Our Verdict

iWinV wins with 3119ms TTFB (vs PHPS.kr's 3265ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseiWinVPHPS.krWinner
DNS Lookup626ms636msiWinV
TCP Connection550ms567msiWinV
TLS Handshake253ms543msiWinV
Server Processing614ms668msiWinV
Total TTFB2043ms2414msiWinV

Technology & Security Features

iWinV

Server/CDNApache/2.4.62 (Rocky
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size67.5 KB

PHPS.kr

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size36.8 KB
0/3
iWinV Security Features
0/3
PHPS.kr Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.