GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

plJCHostvsKru.plpl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

JCHost
WPTR ScoreWinner983 ms
Rank#170
TTFB234ms
Time to 1MB196ms
Score983
LCP634ms
FCP434ms
Kru.pl
WPTR Score4937 ms
Rank#797
TTFB734ms
Time to 1MB1761ms
Score4937
LCP1134ms
FCP934ms

Our Verdict

JCHost wins with 234ms TTFB (vs Kru.pl's 734ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseJCHostKru.plWinner
DNS Lookup133ms80msKru.pl
TCP Connection222ms158msKru.pl
TLS Handshake67ms65msKru.pl
Server Processing91ms408msJCHost
Total TTFB513ms711msJCHost

Technology & Security Features

JCHost

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size77.7 KB

Kru.pl

Server/CDNApache/2
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size62.7 KB
2/3
JCHost Security Features
0/3
Kru.pl Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.