GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

idJetorbitvsRumahwebid

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Jetorbit
WPTR Score6922 ms
Rank#826
TTFB493ms
Time to 1MB2545ms
Score6922
LCP893ms
FCP693ms
Rumahweb
WPTR ScoreWinner5901 ms
Rank#812
TTFB501ms
Time to 1MB2115ms
Score5901
LCP901ms
FCP701ms

Our Verdict

Jetorbit wins with 493ms TTFB (vs Rumahweb's 501ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseJetorbitRumahwebWinner
DNS Lookup63ms10msRumahweb
TCP Connection13ms13msTie
TLS Handshake17ms20msJetorbit
Server Processing721ms782msJetorbit
Total TTFB814ms825msJetorbit

Technology & Security Features

Jetorbit

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size124.5 KB

Rumahweb

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size5.3 KB
3/3
Jetorbit Security Features
3/3
Rumahweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.