JundavsShock Media
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Junda
View Details →
Shock Media
View Details →Our Verdict
Junda wins with 396ms TTFB (vs Shock Media's 814ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Junda | Shock Media | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 183ms | 1ms | Shock Media |
| TCP Connection | 60ms | 48ms | Shock Media |
| TLS Handshake | 66ms | 57ms | Shock Media |
| Server Processing | 182ms | 628ms | Junda |
| Total TTFB | 491ms | 734ms | Junda |
Technology & Security Features
Junda
Shock Media
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.