GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

NLJundavsTrueNL

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Junda
WPTR Score2711 ms
Rank#682
TTFB396ms
Time to 1MB925ms
Score2711
LCP796ms
FCP596ms
True
WPTR ScoreWinner657 ms
Rank#232
TTFB614ms
Time to 1MB107ms
Score657
LCP1014ms
FCP814ms

Our Verdict

Junda wins with 396ms TTFB (vs True's 614ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseJundaTrueWinner
DNS Lookup183ms211msJunda
TCP Connection60ms50msTrue
TLS Handshake66ms53msTrue
Server Processing182ms86msTrue
Total TTFB491ms400msJunda

Technology & Security Features

Junda

Server/CDNNext.js
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size4.5 KB

True

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size116.8 KB
1/3
Junda Security Features
1/3
True Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.