GitHub|Since 2007

ilKamateravsLiveDNSil

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score4092 ms
Rank#803
TTFB2444ms
Time to 1MB1036ms
Score4092
LCP2844ms
FCP2644ms
WPTR ScoreWinner3454 ms
Rank#765
TTFB680ms
Time to 1MB1246ms
Score3454
LCP1080ms
FCP880ms

Our Verdict

LiveDNS wins with 680ms TTFB (vs Kamatera's 2444ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseKamateraLiveDNSWinner
DNS Lookup35ms92msKamatera
TCP Connection12ms185msKamatera
TLS Handshake16ms91msKamatera
Server Processing1543ms96msLiveDNS
Total TTFB1606ms464msLiveDNS

Technology & Security Features

Kamatera

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size161.6 KB

LiveDNS

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size187.9 KB
3/3
Kamatera Security Features
1/3
LiveDNS Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.