KamateravsuPress
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Kamatera
View Details →
uPress
View Details →Our Verdict
uPress wins with 104ms TTFB (vs Kamatera's 2444ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Kamatera | uPress | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 35ms | 7ms | uPress |
| TCP Connection | 12ms | 14ms | Kamatera |
| TLS Handshake | 16ms | 19ms | Kamatera |
| Server Processing | 1543ms | 945ms | uPress |
| Total TTFB | 1606ms | 985ms | uPress |
Technology & Security Features
Kamatera
uPress
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.