GitHub|Since 2007

trKeyubuvsRadoretr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score2068 ms
Rank#571
TTFB50ms
Time to 1MB836ms
Score2068
LCP450ms
FCP250ms
WPTR ScoreWinner599 ms
Rank#159
TTFB202ms
Time to 1MB193ms
Score599
LCP602ms
FCP402ms

Our Verdict

Keyubu wins with 50ms TTFB (vs Radore's 202ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseKeyubuRadoreWinner
DNS Lookup5ms1msRadore
TCP Connection19ms11msRadore
TLS Handshake19ms15msRadore
Server Processing19ms109msKeyubu
Total TTFB62ms136msKeyubu

Technology & Security Features

Keyubu

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size5.3 KB

Radore

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size228.7 KB
2/3
Keyubu Security Features
3/3
Radore Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.