GitHub|Since 2007

AUKinetic ITvsPanthurAU

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score5894 ms
Rank#813
TTFB1188ms
Time to 1MB1848ms
Score5894
LCP1588ms
FCP1388ms
WPTR ScoreWinner2877 ms
Rank#630
TTFB107ms
Time to 1MB989ms
Score2877
LCP507ms
FCP307ms

Our Verdict

Panthur wins with 107ms TTFB (vs Kinetic IT's 1188ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseKinetic ITPanthurWinner
DNS Lookup148ms81msPanthur
TCP Connection674ms399msPanthur
TLS Handshake314ms10msPanthur
Server Processing323ms13msPanthur
Total TTFB1459ms503msPanthur

Technology & Security Features

Kinetic IT

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size389.0 KB

Panthur

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size9.5 KB
1/3
Kinetic IT Security Features
0/3
Panthur Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.