Kinetic ITvsServers Australia
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Kinetic IT
View Details →
Servers Australia
View Details →Our Verdict
Servers Australia wins with 61ms TTFB (vs Kinetic IT's 1217ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Kinetic IT | Servers Australia | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 124ms | 95ms | Servers Australia |
| TCP Connection | 678ms | 11ms | Servers Australia |
| TLS Handshake | 306ms | 16ms | Servers Australia |
| Server Processing | 326ms | 1320ms | Kinetic IT |
| Total TTFB | 1434ms | 1442ms | Servers Australia |
Technology & Security Features
Kinetic IT
Servers Australia
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.