KingHostvsValueHost
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

KingHost
View Details →
ValueHost
View Details →Our Verdict
KingHost wins with 42ms TTFB (vs ValueHost's 1676ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | KingHost | ValueHost | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 188ms | 7ms | ValueHost |
| TCP Connection | 5ms | 242ms | KingHost |
| TLS Handshake | 10ms | 241ms | KingHost |
| Server Processing | 56ms | 274ms | KingHost |
| Total TTFB | 259ms | 764ms | KingHost |
Technology & Security Features
KingHost
ValueHost
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.