GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

plKru.plvsNazwa.plpl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Kru.pl
WPTR Score4937 ms
Rank#797
TTFB734ms
Time to 1MB1761ms
Score4937
LCP1134ms
FCP934ms
Nazwa.pl
WPTR ScoreWinner494 ms
Rank#121
TTFB322ms
Time to 1MB108ms
Score494
LCP722ms
FCP522ms

Our Verdict

Nazwa.pl wins with 322ms TTFB (vs Kru.pl's 734ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseKru.plNazwa.plWinner
DNS Lookup80ms50msNazwa.pl
TCP Connection158ms95msNazwa.pl
TLS Handshake65ms47msNazwa.pl
Server Processing408ms43msNazwa.pl
Total TTFB711ms235msNazwa.pl

Technology & Security Features

Kru.pl

Server/CDNApache/2
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size62.7 KB

Nazwa.pl

Server/CDNApache/2
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size152.6 KB
0/3
Kru.pl Security Features
1/3
Nazwa.pl Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.