GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

plKru.plvsSohostpl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Kru.pl
WPTR Score4937 ms
Rank#797
TTFB734ms
Time to 1MB1761ms
Score4937
LCP1134ms
FCP934ms
Sohost
WPTR ScoreWinner2853 ms
Rank#704
TTFB951ms
Time to 1MB819ms
Score2853
LCP1351ms
FCP1151ms

Our Verdict

Kru.pl wins with 734ms TTFB (vs Sohost's 951ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseKru.plSohostWinner
DNS Lookup80ms231msKru.pl
TCP Connection158ms58msSohost
TLS Handshake65ms60msSohost
Server Processing408ms538msKru.pl
Total TTFB711ms887msKru.pl

Technology & Security Features

Kru.pl

Server/CDNApache/2
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size62.7 KB

Sohost

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size190.5 KB
0/3
Kru.pl Security Features
2/3
Sohost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.