Krystal HostingvsNode4
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Krystal Hosting
View Details →
Node4
View Details →Our Verdict
Krystal Hosting wins with 203ms TTFB (vs Node4's 514ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Krystal Hosting | Node4 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 126ms | 90ms | Node4 |
| TCP Connection | 55ms | 55ms | Tie |
| TLS Handshake | 57ms | 108ms | Krystal Hosting |
| Server Processing | 53ms | 351ms | Krystal Hosting |
| Total TTFB | 291ms | 604ms | Krystal Hosting |
Technology & Security Features
Krystal Hosting
Node4
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.