GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

krKSIDCvsMireenekr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

KSIDC
WPTR ScoreWinner298 ms
Rank#794
TTFB4564ms
Time to 1MB124ms
Score298
LCP4964ms
FCP4764ms
Mireene
WPTR Score46755 ms
Rank#915
TTFB3435ms
Time to 1MB18904ms
Score46755
LCP3835ms
FCP3635ms

Our Verdict

Mireene wins with 3435ms TTFB (vs KSIDC's 4564ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseKSIDCMireeneWinner
DNS Lookup0ms292msKSIDC
TCP Connection0ms264msKSIDC
TLS Handshake0ms543msKSIDC
Server Processing0ms286msKSIDC
Total TTFB0ms1385msMireene

Technology & Security Features

KSIDC

Server/CDNiteasy
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size129.9 KB

Mireene

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size243.9 KB
0/3
KSIDC Security Features
0/3
Mireene Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.