GitHub|Since 2007

NLLeasewebvsSnel.comNL

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score658 ms
Rank#89
TTFB177ms
Time to 1MB136ms
Score658
LCP577ms
FCP377ms
WPTR ScoreWinner514 ms
Rank#25
TTFB98ms
Time to 1MB110ms
Score514
LCP498ms
FCP298ms

Our Verdict

Snel.com wins with 98ms TTFB (vs Leaseweb's 177ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseLeasewebSnel.comWinner
DNS Lookup79ms35msSnel.com
TCP Connection16ms14msSnel.com
TLS Handshake18ms22msLeaseweb
Server Processing219ms179msSnel.com
Total TTFB332ms250msSnel.com

Technology & Security Features

Leaseweb

Server/CDN*
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size598.2 KB

Snel.com

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size259.9 KB
0/3
Leaseweb Security Features
3/3
Snel.com Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.