GitHub|Since 2007

ieLetsHostvsWeb Worldie

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score5814 ms
Rank#811
TTFB419ms
Time to 1MB2112ms
Score5814
LCP819ms
FCP619ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1163 ms
Rank#702
TTFB2154ms
Time to 1MB302ms
Score1163
LCP2554ms
FCP2354ms

Our Verdict

LetsHost wins with 419ms TTFB (vs Web World's 2154ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseLetsHostWeb WorldWinner
DNS Lookup465ms89msWeb World
TCP Connection121ms14msWeb World
TLS Handshake83ms18msWeb World
Server Processing76ms317msLetsHost
Total TTFB745ms438msLetsHost

Technology & Security Features

LetsHost

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size0.0 KB

Web World

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size290.9 KB
3/3
LetsHost Security Features
2/3
Web World Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.