GitHub|Since 2007

trLimonHostvsTrunçgiltr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score2497 ms
Rank#676
TTFB1813ms
Time to 1MB314ms
Score2497
LCP2213ms
FCP2013ms
WPTR ScoreWinner2045 ms
Rank#559
TTFB458ms
Time to 1MB635ms
Score2045
LCP858ms
FCP658ms

Our Verdict

Trunçgil wins with 458ms TTFB (vs LimonHost's 1813ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseLimonHostTrunçgilWinner
DNS Lookup6ms34msLimonHost
TCP Connection5ms39msLimonHost
TLS Handshake11ms26msLimonHost
Server Processing1721ms422msTrunçgil
Total TTFB1743ms521msTrunçgil

Technology & Security Features

LimonHost

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size85.8 KB

Trunçgil

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size73.8 KB
2/3
LimonHost Security Features
1/3
Trunçgil Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.