GitHub|Since 2007

trLimonHostvsVeridyentr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score2497 ms
Rank#676
TTFB1813ms
Time to 1MB314ms
Score2497
LCP2213ms
FCP2013ms
WPTR ScoreWinner633 ms
Rank#274
TTFB586ms
Time to 1MB157ms
Score633
LCP986ms
FCP786ms

Our Verdict

Veridyen wins with 586ms TTFB (vs LimonHost's 1813ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseLimonHostVeridyenWinner
DNS Lookup6ms4msVeridyen
TCP Connection5ms17msLimonHost
TLS Handshake11ms17msLimonHost
Server Processing1721ms218msVeridyen
Total TTFB1743ms256msVeridyen

Technology & Security Features

LimonHost

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size85.8 KB

Veridyen

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size107.7 KB
2/3
LimonHost Security Features
2/3
Veridyen Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.