LittlefishvsNetitude
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Littlefish
View Details →
Netitude
View Details →Our Verdict
Netitude wins with 90ms TTFB (vs Littlefish's 1231ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Littlefish | Netitude | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 39ms | 116ms | Littlefish |
| TCP Connection | 51ms | 4ms | Netitude |
| TLS Handshake | 100ms | 9ms | Netitude |
| Server Processing | 90ms | 128ms | Littlefish |
| Total TTFB | 280ms | 257ms | Netitude |
Technology & Security Features
Littlefish
Netitude
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.