GitHub|Since 2007

GBLucidicavsMiss GroupGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1829 ms
Rank#495
TTFB515ms
Time to 1MB471ms
Score1829
LCP915ms
FCP715ms
WPTR Score8131 ms
Rank#847
TTFB679ms
Time to 1MB3145ms
Score8131
LCP1079ms
FCP879ms

Our Verdict

Lucidica wins with 515ms TTFB (vs Miss Group's 679ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseLucidicaMiss GroupWinner
DNS Lookup88ms64msMiss Group
TCP Connection149ms111msMiss Group
TLS Handshake68ms89msLucidica
Server Processing394ms319msMiss Group
Total TTFB699ms583msLucidica

Technology & Security Features

Lucidica

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size260.1 KB

Miss Group

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size47.9 KB
1/3
Lucidica Security Features
2/3
Miss Group Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.